Handling the case question: walk a credit decision out loud

When a bank or NBFC interviewer says 'talk me through a deal', they are scoring your sequence, not your answer.

Case-style questions are now standard in lending, risk and investment roles across Mumbai and Singapore: price this facility, size this exposure, decide whether you would renew this relationship. There is rarely one right answer. What is being scored is whether your reasoning has a spine.

State the frame before the math

Strong candidates declare the decision frame first: the borrower's cash engine, the downside scenario, the security, the exit. Weak candidates start computing. Interviewers would rather hear "before I size this, I want to know where the repayment actually comes from" than a fast, fragile number.

Show your kill criteria

Every experienced credit person carries conditions under which they walk away. Naming yours - leverage beyond a point, opaque group structures, audited statements you would not rely on - signals real reps. Candidates who try to make every deal work read as salespeople wearing a risk costume.

Close with the memo

End the case the way you would end a credit note: recommendation, conditions precedent, and the one piece of information that would change your mind. That last line is what separates interview answers from professional judgment.

  • Frame first, numbers second
  • Name what would make you decline
  • End with recommendation, conditions and the fact that would flip you

Join the discussion.

Comments are submitted privately for review. They are not displayed automatically. Do not include candidate names or personal details.

Moderated: submissions are held privately. A comment will appear only after a separate editorial review and site update.